Reflection Of The Movie Amistad - 1426 Words

Amistad 1. What is the Central message of this motion picture? The fact that the freedom that we experience today did not come easy, many things had to happen in order to get where we are. 2. Was the film effective in communicating this message? In what ways? Yes, the film showed what it was like back in the day when people from Africa were forced to leave their homeland and become slaves against their will. It showed how the case against the Amistad Africans led to political changes in the U.S. which then had an effect in the rest of the world. 3. How do you think the filmmakers wanted the audience to respond? They probably wanted people to realize and see how bad things really were sometimes. They wanted people to see what the history†¦show more content†¦We take this for granted, but is freedom worth dying for? Do you appreciate the sacrifices that have been made so that you can live free? I believe freedom is worth dying for as long as there is certainty that it will be obtained in the end. I definitely appreciate the sacrifices that people have made and are making today, so that we may live free lives. 9. Has this film helped you to understand the common undergirding that every person feels to be free? How? Give an example. Yes, this film has helped me see that people see freedom as a natural right, something that shouldn’t be taken away from anybody. An example would be the people who have escaped from North Korea, they knew if escaped, then their families would suffer the consequences, but they didn’t see it as bad thing since they knew there wasn’t a very bright future in their country to begin with. So, they escaped to truly live and to be free. This movie really changed my perspective on history, but especially on the history of African-Americans and slavery. Seeing how innocent people who had done nothing to deserve such cruel and terrible inhumane treatment by the hand of others who saw them as inferior, suddenly found themselves being trapped, beaten, stripped of their clothes, families, and belongings, it was very hard for me to wrap my head around the fact that this actually happened. When one tries to imagine what it would have been like if we had been born in that time a nd eraShow MoreRelatedAmistad Movie Reflection748 Words   |  3 PagesIn the movie Amistad there are many instances where African Americans are treated very poorly, just like they were not even the same creature the captors were. I have watched this movie and thought it over thoroughly afterwards. I was tasked after thinking it over the answer the question of â€Å"How could someone’s conscience allow them to treat another human being so horribly?† I find this answer very obvious throughout the film. These men performing these heinous acts of injustice against these AfricanRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Amistad By Steven Spielberg And Howard Jones Book, Mutiny On The Amistad Essay1972 Words   |  8 Pagesâ€Å"Amistad† movie is directed by Steven Spielberg and Howard Jones’ book â€Å"Mutiny on the Amistad: The Saga of a Slave Revolt and its Impact on American Abolition, Law and Diplomacy† are historical accounts of the slave mutiny that occu rred in the year 1839. The incident happened when the slaves at sea, aboard on La Amistad. Spielberg’s movie depicts the incident in visual word, whereas Jones’ has written the book and depicted the entire incident by using words. Both mediums capture the case that hadRead MoreHistory3115 Words   |  13 PagesKampung Baru Cina was opened, the sacrifices of the Malay in sharing their country and privileges, and how the Malay Kings had never given up the sovereignty of their states to the British, she added. â€Å"Colloquiums such as this are not merely a reflection on history, but a chance to revisit to correct misinterpretations so that the minds of the younger generation are on the right track,† shesaid. She called for all the main locations for communist attacks to be gazetted and for the struggles of

Understanding The Looking Glass Self - 1129 Words

A wise sociologist once said, â€Å"In order to be -- or become -- fully human, humans need a great deal of proficiency at taking account of others and forming relationships with them.† Sociology teaches humans where we connect to different groups as well as classifying them into these groups. These classifications that we are assigned include, economic status level, education, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. By doing so, we perceive the view of ourselves and others in the world. The Looking Glass-Self allows us to see our interactions with others as well as what they expect from us according to our behavior (Verderber, 34). That is what sociology is; the study of society and social interaction. Throughout our lives, we have learned and will still continue to learn how to function as a â€Å"normal† human being. What defines normal? Although there are many definitions to this word, one may define it as average. It all depends through the eye of the beholder which is filtered through the lens of society. What that means is, your definition of â€Å"normal† might not exist on its own, but it is created by observing the way of life through your own perspective and experiences. The way I see defining â€Å"normal† is through your own social behavior. When speaking to someone for the first time, the way you come off to others will make them decide whether you are normal or not. You are learning to create relationships by the culture that is formed around you. Culture teaches you and yourShow MoreRelatedWhat I Have Learned From A Social Theory Class1240 Words   |  5 Pagesmajor publications, Mind, Self, and society, The philosophy of the Act and The Philoso phy of the present. He is also Pioneered the development of symbolic interaction perspective which is a school of thought in sociology that explains social behavior in terms of how people interact with each other (http://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/symbolic-interactionism-49). Mead argued that interaction is the key to understanding human behavior and that there can be no self apart from society, noRead MoreMy Social Science Requirement For My Associate Degree923 Words   |  4 Pagesinterested in the theories that sociologist came up with. When I started reading the modern development theorists, Charles Horton Cooley, it was so fascinating because he focused on social interaction. Cooley came up with the concept called â€Å"looking glass self†, and I will explain it and show my view about it in this essay. Charles Horton Cooley was born during the 18’s. He grew up in wealthy life where his father and mother had professional jobs in the industry. He was lonely and shy personRead MoreSocial Construction And Disability Models1579 Words   |  7 Pagesdeaf culture lying at the heart of the linguistic minority construction. Advocates of the disability construction for all the deaf people use the term â€Å"deaf community† to identify people with significant hearing impairment. Medicalization and Looking Glass Self Medicalization is the process by which a phenomena is defined as within the purview of medical expertise and intervention. The trend in our society is toward greater medicalization, and focused on seeing more and more things as in the realmRead MoreAlice s Journey Through Looking Glass World1415 Words   |  6 PagesThe Victorian Era was a time of great innovation and new idÐ µas to voice their people on a variety of different subjects ranging from politics to social structure. Lewis Carroll, a popular authÐ ¾r of the time, Through the looking Glass, which serves to help readers understand children. Children in the era were previously considered unimportant and empty-headed, but Carroll shows, through Alice’s interactions with various characters, how one could be much more intelligent and mature than adults ofRead MoreSymbolic Interaction Theory : The Looking Glass Self And Romantic Relationships1126 Words   |  5 Pagesinteraction with others. Symbolic interaction theor y has greatly impacted our world. This theory helps one understand how individuals shape their own reality and create norms. This essay focuses on the symbolic interaction theory through the looking-glass-self and romantic relationships. Symbolic Interactionism focuses on face-to-face communication. It is also micro-level theory; meaning this theory covers very specific relationships between individuals or small groups. Micro level theories areRead MoreHow I Changed My Life771 Words   |  4 Pagesand how I interact with society. Understanding how I have been affected by my immediate surroundings is a significant part of a better understanding how I have been changed by the greater society. All through this semester, I have begun to reminisce back on my life and pull apart the different ways that I have been affected and how they can be looked at sociologically. The first thing that I genuinely began to break down was the way I distinguish myself. My self-identity is something that I haveRead MoreThe Concept Of The Looking Glass Self1423 Words   |  6 Pagessociology actualized questions of understanding the nature of the individual. This determined the weakening of the behaviorist tradition, which is characterized by a nihilistic attitude to the study of psychological processes and the determination of the human life as a manifestation of the externally observable behavior (by analogy with the animal reaction). The interactionist approach in sociology has been formed and it refers to the integrity of the human personality and self-determination in the micro-socialRead MoreCharles Horton Cooley s Concept Of The Looking Glass Self870 Words   |  4 Pages1902, Charles Horton Cooley fashioned the concept of the looking-glass ‘self,’ this concept was researched to learn how identity is shaped. The authors concluded that people shape their identity based on the perception of how they think others view them. Three ideas comprise the looking-glass ‘self’: First, we see in our mind’s eye how we appear to others, second we imagine their judgment of how we appear to them, and third we develop our ‘self’ (our own identity) receiving the judgments from othersRead MoreFreud id, ego, superego954 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿ To become a healthy adult socially, mentally and physically Freud believed that children must develop a reasonable balance between id and superego. Id is the natural, unsocialized, biological portion of self, including hunger and sexual urges. Superego is composed of internalized social ideas about right and wrong. When describing the effects of socialization: the process through which people learn the rules and practices needed to participate successfully in their culture and society, PeterRead MoreThe Looking Glass Self By George Herbert Mead831 Words   |  4 Pageswas on the mind he developed a sense of self and opened up discussions about the impact of subject and creativity on society to the rather objective approach to the constitution of society. Cooley saw himself as less of a sociologist than as a scholar in history, philosophy and social psychology. The looking glass self was introduced in his book Human Nature and the Social Order the primary group was introduced in Social Organization. The looking glass self describes how an individual develops his

World War II Free Essays

World War I couldn’t have ended any worse. The way it was handled was wrong and as a result of that, a war even worse than before broke out. The three main causes of World War II were the ways France, Britain, and Germany handled it diplomatically, socially, and financially. We will write a custom essay sample on World War II or any similar topic only for you Order Now There are sources that show the actions taken by the countries. After World War I France had made a treaty with the country of Poland that states if either country is attacked, the other will send aid and assistance via money and manpower, â€Å"to lend each other immediate aid and assistance, if such a failure is accompanied by an unprovoked recourse to arms†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Doc 5) This was a key factor in why France went to war against Germany after Poland was invaded by Germany. In an excerpt of Benito Mussolini, What is Fascism, he mentioned that Fascism is â€Å"a force limited to the function of recording results. (Doc 7) Germany was on a conquest to eliminate all of the inferior races, because they weren’t fascist. In a document by British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden it was said that Hitler would go against any treaty even if he wanted to sign it in the first place, â€Å"We must be prepared for him to repudiate any treaty even if freely negotiated†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Doc 9) This would prove to be true when Hitler went against the Non-aggression pact he signed with Russia. As a result of World War I, many countries were looking for someone to blame for the destruction caused. The allies, led by France and Britain, put all the blame on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles, â€Å"The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Doc 1) While Hitler was in prison, he wrote a book called Mein Kampf; in the book he wrote how Jews were the absolute opposite of the Aryan, who was the ones who contributed the most to society, â€Å"The Jew forms the strongest contrast to the Aryan. Hardly in any people of the world is the instinct of self-preservation more strongly developed than in the so-called ‘chosen people’†¦? (Doc 4) After Hitler became Chancellor all Germans started to buy in to beliefs similar to this. In a draft for a student composition on the advantages of war, it is said that War is great and to do anything for the Fatherland is the highest honor one could have. â€Å"It is sweet to die for the Fatherland. The dead of the enemy live in the memory of the victor. † (Doc 6) Hitler used these kinds of beliefs to get his country into believing taking over the world was possible. In 1929 the Great Depression struck the United States, shortly after it spread all over the world. This is widely known to also be a cause of World War II. As part of the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was forced to be broken up. West Prussia was separated and was soon on a downward spiral to collapse after economic decay. The German delegation had this to say on the move, â€Å"East Prussia is to be completely cut off from the rest of the empire and thereby condemned to economic and natural decay. † (Doc 2) An author wrote about how the way life was like, was beyond anything ever imagined. â€Å"What we believed to be the limits of possibility have been so enormously exceeded. (Doc 3) No one had taken a hit from the economy going down the drain then Germany. Their employment rate was at an all time low. Heinrich Hauser had this to say about the homeless situation. â€Å"An almost unbroken chain of homeless men extends the whole length of the great Hamburg-Berlin highway. † (Doc 8) If they were to repeat the actions the Allies took after their victory in WWI, I’m sure they would have done it much different. They should have been more lenient on Germany and worked together. There is no doubt that their harsh actions only angered Germany even more and caused the Great War known as World War II. How to cite World War II, Essay examples World War II Free Essays string(24) " a province of Prussia\." The Second World War was one of the most devastating moments in the history of humanity. The conflict claimed the lives of millions of people throughout the world; the number of fatalities actually make it the most fatal in history. The war also proved to be costly; the global damages amount to trillions of dollars. We will write a custom essay sample on World War II or any similar topic only for you Order Now Years prior, the First World War occurred. Those involved in the first conflict tried to take the necessary precautions to avoid another international war from taking place. Unfortunately, it was this attempt that caused the second war to occur. This research paper aims to discuss how the First World War resulted in the occurrence of the Second World War. The First World War ended on November 11, 1918. The experience of such war required the creation of a peace settlement. In January 1919, the countries which emerged victorious in the war sent their representatives to gather in Paris. The said assembly would make political decisions that would influence international relations. The decisions were mostly influenced by the heads of the Allied states. These are France Premier Georges Clemenceau, British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, and Italian Prime Minister Vittorio Orlando and United States President Woodrow Wilson . Prior to the armistice that ended the First World War, President Wilson had already formulated a plan to establish peace. In a speech he delivered to Congress, Wilson announced the â€Å"Fourteen Points,† a set of provisions that would restore world peace. Among the fourteen provisions, three are notable. One of which is the â€Å"peace without victory† clause. Wilson thought that the aftermath of the war should not bring victory, but instead it should bring peace. He also thought that Germany must not be given cruel punishment or else it would provoke the country to avenge its loss. For Wilson, the appropriate penalty would enable the defeated parties as well as the Allied powers to have peaceful relations. Another provision which Wilson suggested was disarmament. Wilson upheld the belief that only through disarmament can peace be truly achieved. If each country were disarmed there would be no threats of war or invasion. He also thought that issues between nations must be discussed openly. Moreover, Wilson suggested the establishment of an organization which could serve as the platform in which international disputes can be settled and wars could be prevented. He referred to it as the League of Nations. The provisions that Wilson suggested may have born out of noble intentions, but it was contrary to what the European Allies wanted. European nations involved in the war were bitter over what had occurred. This holds true for France. Most of the battles occurred in France; many soldiers and civilians were killed. The French were still threatened by what Germany was capable of doing. Therefore, as opposed to what Wilson suggested, France wanted to severely punish Germany and render it incapable of waging yet another war. The aftermath of the First World War included the signing of several peace treaties. However, the most notable was the Treaty of Versailles. It was a peace treaty agreed upon by the Allies and Germany. The creation of the treaty began on January 18, 1919 at the Paris Peace Conference; it was signed on June 28th that same year at the Palace of Versailles. It was this treaty that primarily caused the Second World War to occur. This is because aside from punishing Germany through reparations, it made Germany solely responsible for the occurrence of the war. The Germans reacted to the treaty with much disdain; this is why when Adolf Hitler came to power, he sought to abolish the treaty. The provision President Wilson made about the League of Nations was established through the Treaty of Versailles. Those nations who were part of the League had to recognize the boundaries of the other member nations; they also had to bring all contentions to the League for settlement . Over sixty countries were part of the League, excluding the United States. The absence of the United States in the League proved to be a disadvantage for the organization. On the other hand, Wilson’s wish against the severe punishment of Germany was not granted. The Treaty of Versailles had Germany at the losing end of the agreement. It was responsible for the decreasing not only Germany’s territory, but its power in general. The penalties given to Germany were so harsh that the treaty was criticized by many. Armstrong wrote, â€Å"On the whole, when rights were not in conflict, the Conference tried to base its decisions on high principles; when rights were in conflict it usually favored the victors. This statement held true for the treaty. The treaty prioritized the rights of the Allied nations over the rights of Germany. For instance, France emerged victorious in the war. Most of the demands of the French were considered and granted by the treaty. France was able to regain possession of Alsace-Lorraine as indicated in Section V of Part III of the treaty. As payment for the coal mine destruction, Germany also has to hand over control of the Saar Basin to France, as indicated in Article 45 of Section IV. However, one significant loss of Germany involved the Polish Corridor. Created after the First World War, the Polish Corridor was an area of land which detached East Prussia from Germany. The city of Danzig near the Baltic Sea was made a free port by the treaty. Both Poland and Germany had no control over this territory. However, it was inappropriate for the treaty to remove the Corridor from Germany; this is because Germany was not to blame for the seizure of this territory. It was Prussia, not Germany, who seized the Corridor from Poland. King of Prussia Frederick the Great was the one responsible for the territorial loss of Poland. The Corridor was only included in the territory of the German Empire as a province of Prussia. You read "World War II" in category "Papers" It is crucial to note that the corridor formerly known as West Prussia was never really recognized as a territory of Germany. Hence, to punish Germany by taking away land the nation did not seize in the first place was unjustified. The Treaty of Versailles also demilitarized Germany in very specific terms. As included in the â€Å"Military, Naval and Air Clauses,† the treaty states that the German army must only consist of ten divisions: seven for infantry and three for cavalry. The entire army must only be composed a hundred thousand individuals. The treaty even forbade Germany from importing weapons or using poisonous gases or liquids. Meanwhile, in Article 42 of â€Å"Political Clauses for Europe,† both banks of the Rhine River were made free from German military occupation. Such rules were resented by the Germans; it was therefore no surprise that the first thing Hitler did when he came to power was to restore the military forces of Germany, eventually causing the Second World War. The Treaty of Versailles also seized all of Germany’s foreign territories. Article 119 states that â€Å"Germany renounces in favour of the Principal Allied and Associated Powers all her rights and titles over her overseas possessions. † These include areas in Asia, Africa and the Pacific. Through mandates given by the League, the German colonies in Africa were placed under French and British control. However, the gravest imposition of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany was the War Guilt Clause. Article 231 states that â€Å"Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies. † The treaty had singled out Germany as the only country to blame for the occurrence of the First World War. This stand was based on a report by the â€Å"Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War† headed by Robert Lansing, the U. S. Secretary of State. During the Committee’s deliberations, Lansing made sure that there was no German involved in the process. The claim was considered as false, prompting American historian H. E. Barnes to ask for the clause to be revised. Despite the invalid claim of the War Guilt Clause, Germany still signed the Treaty of Versailles. This is because the German representatives were forced and threatened to sign the treaty. The clause demanded that Germany should pay reparations to the other countries involved for the damage the war caused. The reparations totaled to $33 billion, an amount only settled years after Germany agreed to the treaty. Germans disagreed with such amount because the nation was incapable of paying that great sum. Germany also argued that they are not the only one to blame for the war. German aggression, which contributed to causing the war, was retaliation against the Treaty of Versailles. From the start, Germany disagreed with the harsh penalties stated in the treaty. The treaty made Germany the only party to blame for the First World War. As punishment, the country was stripped off its military capabilities and its foreign territories. In addition, the treaty demanded a significant sum of money for war damages. When Hitler became powerful, he disobeyed the treaty. Not only did he strengthen the German army, he also sought the return of the Polish Corridor to Germany. The Treaty of Versailles was a crucial contributor to the occurrence of the Second World War for many reasons. The end of the First World War made the international community seek for ways in which to preserve world peace. In addition, they wanted to establish fairness and rapport among the countries after the way. The Allied nations created a treaty in hopes of reaching these objectives. Unfortunately, the treaty failed to fulfill its goal. The reason why the Treaty of Versailles did not work was because it was flawed from the beginning. From the start, it was not feasible to try to achieve peace immediately after such a brutal war. It is also ridiculous to try to be just in dealing with every country involved. For example, France wanted Germany to be severely punished because France was greatly affected by the war. Because the affected parties want revenge against Germany, the treaty that was established on good intentions eventually resulted in more damages. The noble intention of seeking peace and justice was contrary to how the Treaty of Versailles was made. Upon entering the peace negotiations, both Britain and France already sought to seek revenge. Germany and Russia were deliberately left out of the Peace Conference. To make matters worse, reparations were being demanded from people who were already affected by war. All of these contributed to causing the Second World War. Vindictive sentiments played a significant part in the ineffectiveness of the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty of Versailles was the initial attempt in attaining peace. There were other ways in which peace was tried to achieve after the war. There was the Washington Conference, in which it was agreed that nations would only have a certain number of ships and have the same opportunities to access China. Then there was the Locarno Pact in 1925; in a conference held in Switzerland, countries agreed that all conflicts would be resolved peacefully. One of the specific areas of concern during that time was French-German border. Lastly, there was the Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1928. Fifteen countries participated in an agreement which condemned war as â€Å"instrument of national policy. † Both pacts served to establish peaceful settlement as substitute to force. In the long run, these attempts at peace proved futile. The aftermath of the First World War brought much dissatisfaction to both winners and losers. The dissatisfaction of Germany is understood. It lost in the war, and was blamed for it. The Treaty of Versailles â€Å"humiliated† Germany with such severe impositions. Instead of encouraging peaceful relations, the treaty was punitive in nature. Such punitive effort will never achieve peace. In addition, the losses of Germany in the war were significant. Many people were killed, while damage to property was also notable. The treaty’s terms in which Germany would pay a great sum for war damages already added insult in injury. Such harsh punishment prompted strong nationalist sentiments, which contributed to German aggression in the Second World War. The Treaty of Versailles also failed to address the concerns of Italy and Japan. Italy was dissatisfied with what it had gained from the war. At that time, the country was already experiencing internal conflicts. The â€Å"diplomatic frustration† of Italy as result of the First World War added to the problem. The parliamentary system of government was eventually replaced with fascism. Fascism, under Benito Mussolini, made Italy more aggressive in war. Japan was also dissatisfied with its diplomatic status after the war. Though Japan was a victor in the First World War, the country was frustrated because it wanted more than what it gained. Japan believed that they should be the stronger force in Asia. This sentiment was driven by the influence of the military, as well as nationalism. All three countries were frustrated with the outcome of the First World War. These nations also felt economically deprived after the war. All three criticized the lack of equal access to â€Å"raw materials, markets and capital investment areas,† which contributed to the decline of their economic stability. In turn, the nationalist feelings in all countries brought out vindictive sentiments. Thomas Hobbes once wrote that people would â€Å"choose rather to hazard their life, than not to be revenged. These countries felt the injustice; another war seemed to be an ideal venue in which revenge could be taken. The Treaty of Versailles also caused the war through the League of Nations. It is true that the League was created to establish peace after war, but in reality the League was powerless to do so. The absence of the United States made a huge impact on weakening the power of the League. It was not influential enough to enforce necessary penalties on offenders. There are several examples in which the League of Nations proved ineffective. When Italy attacked Ethiopia, the emperor of the latter reported to the League. Italy only denounced the invasion. The organization asked its members to stop selling weapons and commodities to Italy, but only a few obliged. Ethiopia eventually became a colony of Italy. The Treaty of Versailles also caused Japanese aggression against China. The treaty removed all the foreign possessions of Germany. Japan benefited from this removal, as it gained territories in the Pacific as a result. However, the Shantung Peninsula was left unresolved. The issue was to be settled between Japan and China. This created conflict, and Japanese aggression toward China soon started with the Manchurian invasion. The takeover was denounced by the League, but that was all it did. Japan left to League, and continued to threaten China. The First World War caused the occurrence of the Second World War. The Treaty of Versailles was the primary cause. The treaty was supposed to establish peace after such grueling conflict, but it only resulted in another, more fatal war. To begin with, the process in which the supposed peace settlement was created ran contrary to its intentions. Victors such as France and Britain was preoccupied with revenging their losses. This meant that their demands included in the treaty were based more on revenge than on the intention of achieving peace. Such vindictive attitude greatly influenced the drafting of the treaty. The vindictive intention in the drafting of the Treaty of Versailles also caused German aggression. In general, the treaty was created to punish Germany. Many people thought the terms were too severe. This included limiting the German military and losing several territories. The most notable of these territories was the Polish Corridor, a territory that taken from Germany as stipulated in the treaty. In addition, there was the War Guilt Clause, the false claim which stated that Germany was the only one responsible for the war. Such terms caused much resentment from the German people. This prompted Adolf Hitler to be aggressive, and undo the damages caused by the treaty. The Treaty of Versailles also did not address the needs of Italy and Japan, which caused them to also be aggressive. Italy and Japan were disappointed with the outcome of the war. Along with Germany, both countries were economically frustrated. Another war provided the venue to gain what these countries thought they deserved. Lastly, the League of Nations created through the treaty was ineffective and powerless. It could denounce acts of violence against nations, but it was unable to exert any real influence. The organization had no power to prevent one nation from attacking another. In the end, in an effort to avoid war, the consequences of the First World War brought about the more massive Second World War. Neither peace nor justice was achieved; there was only more violence. How to cite World War II, Essays World War II Free Essays

English Language and Linguistics Introduction To Systemic Functional

Question: Describe about the English Language and Linguistics for Introduction To Systemic Functional. Answer: Ice Hockey may be probably one of the most exciting games to follow presently but few people know the rules. Ice hockey may be probably One of the most exciting games To follow presently Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability complement predicator Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE But Few people know The rules Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE One cannot possibly play ice hockey today if he is not a good skater. one cannot possibly play Ice hockey today Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability predicator complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE If He Is not A good skater Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Evidently every ice hockey player must be an expert in skating presently because else they might get injured . evidently Every hockey player Must be An expert In skating presently Mood Adjunct: probability Subject Mood Adjunct: probability Complement predicator Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Because else They might Get injured Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE The punk would probably hit the ice so fast that it travels 100 miles an hour. The punk would probably Hit The ice So fast Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE That it Travels 100 miles an hour Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE The players would require hitting the punk with the sticks and the sticks long L-shaped. The players would require hitting The punk With the stick Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE And The sticks Are long L-shaped Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Ice hockey can probably be a game in this time that takes great skill and courage. Ice hockey can probably be A game In this time Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE That takes Great skill and courage Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE One should not probably play this game ever if he is afraid of injury. one Should not probably play This game ever Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE If He is afraid of injury Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE The game comes with a handy set of injuries always which is hard to ignore. The game Comes with A handy set of injuries always Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Which is Hard to ignore Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Ice hockey may probably be undoubted always as an exciting game to follow. Ice hockey May probably Be undoubted Always Subject Finite: modality modalization Mood Adjunct: probability Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE As An exciting game to follow. Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE The punk must be probably the most important part in the game which is a small piece of rubber. The punk Must be probably The most important part in the game subject Finite: modality modalization Predicator Complement Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Which Is a Small piece of rubber. Subject Finite present Adjunct MOOD RESIDUE Reference: eggins, s. (2016).An Introduction To Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd ed. london: Continuum international Publishing Group. Gee, J., 2015.Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Routledge. Martin, J.R., 2014. Evolving systemic functional linguistics: beyond the clause.Functional Linguistics,1(1), p.1. Matthiessen, C. M. (2012). Systemic Functional Linguistics as appliable linguistics: social accountability and critical approaches.DELTA: Documentao de Estudos em Lingstica Terica e Aplicada,28(SPE), 435-471.